Video Storytime

Print
Type of Pilot Project: 
Public Service
Describe Project and Impact: 
I believe we can reduce the damage caused by having a parent incarcerated while sharing the importance of reading together.
Project Description and Expected Outcomes: 
We set aside (or repurpose) a study room/meeting room in a library and in the room, we have a small collection of children's books, maybe some children's toys, a computer with a webcam, speakers, and microphone, and a large TV as the display for the computer. Parents can reserve the room, bring their little one to the library, and establish a video chat with the child's incarcerated parent so the family can read and sing together, i.e. have a family storytime. I hope that facilitating this storytime will mitigate the upheaval that comes with having a parent incarcerated and will provide the child with the benefits of reading aloud with his/her parents.
Why should we select this project?: 
I think this project should be selected because it executes the library's mission to be an engine of social justice. Children shouldn't be punished for the crimes of their parents. We have a charge to provide library service to all members of our community, especially those at risk like the children of inmates.
Constraints, Limitations, or Dependencies: 
Technology infrastructure, time constraints for the video chat, lack of partnership with Department of Corrections/OK County Sheriff's Office, cost.
Source of Inspiration: 
Partner/Supporting Departments: 
Digital Library
Information Technology
Outreach
Public Services
Performance Indicators: 
Market Penetration
Member Retention
Environment: 
Extra-Library
Relationship: 
Spark
Experience: 
InterReach
Cluster: 
Bedtime Stories
Rising Stars
Estimated Costs
Personnel: 
$0
Commodities: 
$10,000
Contractual (Professional Services): 
$0
Capital (Construction/Renovations): 
$1,000
Total: 
$11,000.00

Comments

26
vicki.thompson
Great Idea!
This could be such a fantastic program for both the children and the parents. We could potentially partner with <a href="http://www.newhopeoklahoma.org/">New Hope Oklahoma</a> or the state's commission on <a href="https://www.ok.gov/occy/Programs/Children_of_Incarcerated_Parents/">Oklahoma Children of Incarcerated Parents</a>. Child Trends estimated that 5 million U.S. children have had at least one parent imprisoned - about one in every 14 children under 18. For black children, the rate was one in nine. A 2008 Bureau of Justice report estimated that 52% of state inmates and 63% of federal inmates—reported having minor children. This would provide children with a positive environment to visit their parents and engage in educational activities, and hopefully reduce the trauma experienced by children of incarcerated parents.
cbassett
Fascinating link Tim. Thanks
Fascinating link Tim. Thanks for sharing this great idea.
joshua.caudill
A Moving Idea
Most of the ideas that immediately came to mind when I saw this Pilot Projects post were opportunities to expand services to our members. This, I think, does much more: not only does it work toward our broader 'social justice' goals, it gives us a chance to offer a completely new service. It doesn't just do something new for our members or increase interest in the library, it builds a new service around the needs of the community members we hope to reach. Have you thought of any other ways we could use a resource like this? Do you think it would work best as a room exclusively for communication with incarcerated family members, or could it be a multi-use room set up for wireless communication? For instance, could a grandparent use the room to make video calls to out-of-state family?
tim.spindle
re: a moving idea
Hi Joshua, I imagine the scenario you mentioned, i.e. a "quiet space" in which someone could make a video call, could be a possible use for this space but I think the calls to incarcerated parents would certainly take precedence. Additionally, with the ubiquity of cameras & chatting software built into nearly all mobile & desktop devices, I don't know whether we'd have a sizable audience nor am I sure that leisure calls would be the best use of this equipment. Maybe this room could also be used by organizations or individuals who need to make video calls for coworking, studying, interviews, etc?
joshua.caudill
I think I agree. Here's where
I think I agree. Here's where I'm torn: in having a space set aside exclusively for incarcerated families, I worry that we may have a space which is rarely used. In having a space that can be used for that as well as any number of other video conference needs, I worry that we'll be impeding people's opportunities to use the space for its primary purpose (incarcerated families and their communication). The widespread popularity of smart devices is a very good point, as well, however, and I think it'd definitely be a mistake to impede that primary use to make a service like Skyping a family member out of town available, as that's not by a long shot going to be the most efficient method for doing so. Perhaps it can be reserved for contacting incarcerated family members, but the space can also be available for specialized programming--for instance, a class in which we teach senior citizens (or anyone who does not consider themselves to be technologically apt) how to use such technology for video calling. I do also like the idea of it being available for reservation for interviews and conference calls!
tim.spindle
In the link I shared to the
In the link I shared to the BPL, it looks like their video setup might be on a mobile stand so maybe that would be a way to facilitate this program by having a mobile unit? This would allow us to wheel the setup into any room although if the children's collection was included, we'd have to find a way to transport it, too.
drobertus
how about military families
how about military families who are separated because of deployment? I'm unaware if this is something that is offered at TAFB Library, or not.
shannon.priddy
Excellent Idea
I am very happy to see this posted here as I was planning to post the same thing. I read a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/05/nyregion/resurgent-new-york-city-libraries.html?_r=0">New York Times </a> article the other day about all the amazing things that the library systems in NYC are doing and they listed the program from Tim's link. I'd like to provide a little backup to Tim's proposed program. <ul> <li>It’s estimated that over 26,000 children in Oklahoma have an incarcerated parent. - <a href=https://www.ok.gov/occy/documents/CIP%20Taskforce%20Report.pdf>OKGOV</a></li> <li>Most Children of Prisoners Need: <ul><li>Consistent, caring adults who understand that, in general, children love their parents, even when they have committed a crime </li> <li>People who will not condemn the incarcerated parents as worthless </li> <li><strong>A chance to learn and practice skills and keep busy with activities </li> <li><strong>People who can help them to maintain contact with their incarcerated parent or parents </strong>or explain to them why they cannot maintain contact</li> - <a href=http://www.okdhs.org/OKDHS%20Publication%20Library/14-63.pdf#search=14%2D63”> OKDHS </a></ul></li> </ul> We could help them maintain the relationship with their parent, help them learn and practice reading, and provide them with a safe environment to take part in other activities. This would hopefully bring in new members and once they are here and discover what all we offer hopefully keep them coming back for other programs and resources. If we were to move forward with this program I would suggest when reaching out to the DOC recommending Mabel Bassett Correctional Center (MBCC) as a pilot site. MBCC is a female prison just outside of Oklahoma County in Pottawatomie. They are open to outside programs encouraging the women to have relationships with their families. I know they have the Girl Scout’s program <em >Girl Scouts Beyond Bars</em> and they have worked with Big Brothers Big Sisters to have inmates send enrollment forms to their families (I used to work for BBBS and toured the facility back in 2011).
vicki.thompson
(No subject)
david.newyear
(No subject)
jhausburg
(No subject)
jballou
(No subject)
afischer
(No subject)
kdelaney
(No subject)
heather.zeoli
(No subject)
ben.mead-harvey
(No subject)
ckennedy
(No subject)
jbrooks
(No subject)
christopher.stofel
(No subject)
llovely
(No subject)
asuhrstedt
(No subject)
rachel.kopchick
(No subject)
jessica.gonzalez
(No subject)
ebedford
(No subject)
ashley.welke
(No subject)
tpodzemny
(No subject)
Site Feedback